检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖飞[1,2] 胡波[1,2] 宋亚峰[1,2] 游建[1,2]
机构地区:[1]武汉市普爱医院 [2]武汉市骨科医院胃肠外科,湖北武汉430030
出 处:《武汉大学学报(医学版)》2015年第5期786-788,791,共4页Medical Journal of Wuhan University
摘 要:目的:比较全腔镜胃癌根治术(TLG)与传统腔镜辅助胃癌根治术(LAG)全胃切除的安全性及可行性。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年3月我院30例TLG和32例LAG患者的临床资料。结果:62例手术均获成功,无1例中转开腹。与传统的LAG组相比,TLG组吻合时间、清扫淋巴结总数均无明显差异。但术中出血量明显减少,切口长度明显减小,下床活动时间、住院时间明显缩短。且术后患者的疼痛评分明显减轻。TLG组均未出现吻合口漏、吻合口狭窄或吻合口出血等吻合口相关并发症。LAG组1例出现吻合口漏,1例出现吻合口狭窄。结论:全腔镜下吻合技术及小切口腔镜辅助吻合技术在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中均安全可行,TLG组与LAG组相比具有创伤小、出血少、恢复快、住院时间短及疼痛感轻等优势,近期效果显著。Objective: To compare the safety and feasibility between totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG) and conventional laparoscopic-assisted gastreetomy (LAG) in gastric cancer. Methods: Clinical data of 30 patients who received totally laparoscopic gastrectomy and another 32 patients who received conventional laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in our hospital from January 2012 to March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: All procedures were completed successfully. Compared with the patients who underwent LAG, there were no significant difference in mean time of anastomosis, number of dissected lymph nodes in the patients who underwent TLG. However there were marked difference in the mean blood loss, the mean incision length, the mean off-bed time and the hospital stay days in the patients who underwent TLG. Meanwhile we found that postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the patients who underwent TLG than in the patients who underwent LAG. There developed in TLG. These complications included one patient developed anastomotic leakage and LAG. Conclusion: Both TLG and LAG are safe were no complications related to the anastomosis anastomotic leakage, stenosis and bleeding. But one patients developed anastomotic stenosis in and feasible for gastric cancer. Compared with small incision-assisted anastomosis, totally laparoscopic anastomosis is associated with less inju ry, less blood loss, quicker postoperative recovery, shorter time, less pain and satisfactory short term efficacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42