检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨媛媛[1] 张宝琴[1] 毛羽佳[1] 郑蕾[1] 张敏芝[1] 谭大鹏[1]
出 处:《中国现代医生》2015年第22期63-66,共4页China Modern Doctor
摘 要:目的改良Parks切口联合丙美卡因表面麻醉在青少年共同性斜视矫正术中的应用及术后恢复情况的临床观察。方法随机选取55例已在我院行共同性斜视矫正术患者,分为改良组和传统组,其中改良组(n=35)采用改良Parks切口联合丙美卡因表面麻醉手术方式,传统组(n=20)采用传统角膜缘梯型切口联合利多卡因局部麻醉手术方式,观察两组手术麻醉耐受性、术后美容效果及手术前后泪膜稳定情况。对得出的数据进行统计分析。结果丙美卡因表面麻醉与传统手术利多卡因局部麻醉患者耐受性无显著差异(P>0.05);术后美容效果Parks切口较传统角膜缘梯型切口隐蔽,且恢复快、好,斜视术后正位效果好,差异有统计学意义;荧光素染色泪膜破裂时间(FBUT)及schirmer’sⅠ实验(S1T)术后30 d改良组均好于传统对照组,差异有统计学意义。结论改良术麻醉耐受效果好,对患者的侵入性操作较传统手术少,对正常组织破坏少,术后美容效果好、眼表泪膜功能影响小,值得推广。Objective To observe the application of improved Parks incision combined with proparacaine surface anesthesia in the correction surgery of adolescent concomitant strabismus and the postoperative recovery situation. Methods Fifty-five patients who had received concomitant strabismus correction surgery in our hospital were randomly selected and divided into the improved group and the traditional group, of which the improved group (35 patients) was given the improved Parks incision combined with proparacaine surface anesthesia surgical method and the traditional group (20 patients) was given traditional corneal limbus trapezoid incision combined with lidocaine local anesthesia surgical method. The surgical anesthesia tolerance, postoperative cosmetic results and preoperative and postoperative tear film stability of the two groups were observed. The data were analyzed statistically. Results The patients received propara caine surface anesthesia and the patients received lidocaine local anesthesia were not significantly different in the tolerance(P〉0.05). Regarding to cosmetic results, the Parks incision concealed itself better than the traditional corneal limbus trapezoid incision, and showed faster and better recovery and better postoperative orthotopic effects, with statis- tically significant differences. The improved group was better than the traditional group in the fluorescein staining tear film break-up time (FBUT) and schirmer's I experiment (SIT) 30 days after surgery, with statistically significant differences. Conclusion The improved surgery has better anesthetic tolerance effect, less invasive operation, less damage to normal tissue, better postoperative cosmetic results and smaller influence on ocular surface tear film function than the traditional surgery, thereby worthy of promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173