检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《山东警察学院学报》2015年第4期69-75,共7页Journal of Shandong Police College
摘 要:亲属拒证权是刑事诉讼中一项特殊的证据制度。在现代法治国家中,很多都以成文法或判例的方式承认了该制度的价值。但因为种种原因,自新中国成立以来,我国一直没有确立证人拒证权制度。进入21世纪,我国提出了构建社会主义和谐社会的战略任务,社会主流的价值观念更多倾向于保障公民权利,以及协调国家利益与个人利益。新修正的刑事诉讼法将亲属拒证权纳入其中就是社会主流观念改变的一个重要体现。然而,新刑事诉讼法所规定的"亲属拒证权"并非真正意义上的亲属拒证权。通过对亲属拒证权概念的厘清,可以对亲属拒证权有进一步深入的了解。Relatives' right to reject testifying is a special evidence system in criminal litigation. In modern country under rule of law,this system can find its full value and expression in statute law or legal precedent. But the system of rights to reject testifying has not been established since the founding of new China for some reasons.21 st century has witnessed the proposal of constructing harmonious socialist country. When it comes to social mainstream values,there is a tendency that civil rights shall be safeguarded and national interests shall be coordinated with personal interests. Relatives ' right to reject testifying has been included into newly amended criminal procedure law,which fully reflects the change of social mainstream concept. Meanwhile,'relatives' right to reject testifying'prescribed in new criminal procedure law is not true relatives' right to reject testifying in some sense. We can have a further understanding of relatives' right to reject testifying by clarifying the definition of relatives' right to reject testifying.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28