检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾海鸥[1] 张燕[2] 刘芳[2] 逯文华[2] 侯文辉[2] 贾静[2]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京口腔医院急诊科,主治医师北京100050 [2]武警总医院口腔科,硕士生北京100039
出 处:《口腔颌面修复学杂志》2015年第4期228-231,共4页Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics
基 金:首都市民培育计划(项目编号:Z131100006813005)
摘 要:目的:分析磨牙症患者的压力知觉和应对方式情况。方法:运用压力知觉量表和简易应对方式问卷,对452名患者进行问卷调查,所得数据使用t检验和卡方检验进行分析。结果:磨牙症组与非磨牙症组的应对能力知觉差异显著(P<0.05)。磨牙症组在"寻求业余爱好,积极参加文体活动"条目上的得分与非磨牙症组间存在明显差异(P<0.05)。两组在"不把问题看的太严重"(积极应对,条目5)和"幻想可能会发生某种奇迹改变现状"(消极应对,条目19)这两种应对方式上的百分数存在明显差异(P<0.05)。结论:磨牙症患者的应对能力知觉差于非磨牙症患者,且较少采取积极的应对方式。Objective: To invesigate the perceived stress and coping style of patients with bruxism. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted on 452 patients by using the Perceived Stress Scale and the Simple Coping Style Questionnaire, and data analysis was conducted using t test and chi square tests. Results: There was significant difference in perceived coping ability between bruxism group and non bruxism group(P〈0.05). Bruxism group's scores were significantly different in the item of"seek hobby, and participate in sports activities actively", comparing with non bruxism group(P〈0.05). Percentages of the two coping styles were significantly different(P〈0.05) in the item of"does not make the problem so serious"(positive coping, item 5) and"imagines some miracle may occur to change the status"(negative coping,item 19). Conclusion: Patients with bruxism were worse than non bruxism patients in perceived coping ability and rarely adopted positive coping styles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15