检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1] 第四军医大学西京医院烧伤与皮肤外科,陕西省西安710032 [2] 第二炮兵工程大学门诊部
出 处:《中国基层医药》2015年第16期2414-2417,共4页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81201470)
摘 要:目的:探讨混合式(B-Learning)教学模式在烧伤科教学中的应用效果。方法选取某校2010级本科临床学生234名,将其按数字表法随机分为实验组117名和对照组117名,实验组采用 B-Learning 教学方法,对照组采用传统教学方法,对学习效果进行评估。结果实验组基础理论成绩(75.39±12.04)分,优于对照组的(68.27±12.38)分,实验组临床技能成绩(76.42±11.89)分,优于对照组的(65.36±12.05)分,实验组专业知识成绩(79.92±12.85)分,优于对照组的(71.56±13.01)分,差异均有统计学意义(t =4.191、4.536、5.191,均 P <0.05);实验组学生的学习兴趣、沟通能力、批判性思维能力、合作精神均显著提高。结论混合式学习法能激发学生的学习兴趣,提高自主学习能力,同时这种学习方法可以拓展学习时空,整合学习资源,提高操作水平,对烧伤科教学有一定帮助。Objective To investigate the application of B -Learning mode in the teaching of department of burns surgery.Methods 234 students were divided into two parts by digital table method randomly.The experimental group was applied by the means of B -learning mode,while the control group was taught by the traditional way.And the results were evaluated.Results The basic theory scores(75.39 ±12.04)points in the students of experimental group were higher than those of the control group(68.27 ±12.38)points.The practice scores(76.42 ±11.89)points in the students of experimental group were higher than those of the control group(65.36 ±12.05)points.Students' professional knowledge scores(79.92 ±12.85)points in the experimental group were higher than those of the control group(71.56 ±13.01)points.Both percentage and score were higher in the experimental group than in the control group in comprehensive ability.Conclusion Blending learning gives students a potential time,environment and recourse to learn.By integrating learning ability and nursing skills improved,B -learning mode plays an important role in improving the quality of burn department internship.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222