检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《护理学报》2015年第15期1-3,共3页Journal of Nursing(China)
基 金:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2012KYB029)
摘 要:目的评估集中培训联合结伴式互补学习培训造口探访员的可行性及效果。方法首先招募选拔6名造口探访员,对造口探访相关理论知识进行集中授课培训,而对探访实践技能采用结伴式互补学习的多元化培训方式进行培训,培训结束后,从对探访员知识掌握程度评价、独立解决问题能力的自我评价、被探访者探访后自我护理能力提高效果3个方面进行综合评价。结果 6名探访者集中培训后的知识测评分显著高于培训前,在结伴式互补学习过程中,培训6月时探访员自我测评独立解决问题比例显著提高,接受探访患者的自我护理能力显著高于同期未接受探访者。结论集中培训联合结伴式互补学习的培训方法适用对造口探访员的培训,具有推广价值。Objective To evaluate the feasibility and effects of centralized training combined with complementary companion study in stoma visitor training. Methods Six selected stoma visitors received intensive training on theoretical knowledge of stoma visit, then they obtained practical visiting skills in a complementary learning way. Comprehensive evaluation of stoma visitors knowledge, visitors’ self-assessment of problem-solving ability and self-care ability of the patients to whom visitors paid a visit after the centralized training. Results The knowledge of six selected stoma visitors was improved after the centralized training. In the process of complementary companion study, problem-solving ability was significantly improved in visitor ’s self-assessment. Self-care ability of the patients was significantly promoted when compared with those without visits. Conclusion Centralized training combined with complementary companion study is practical for the stoma visitor training ,which is of significance and worth to be promoted.
分 类 号:G421[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46