检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王观龙[1] 李媛媛[1] 龚享文[1] 何毅芳 张玉佩[1] 杨钦河[1]
出 处:《辽宁中医药大学学报》2015年第9期151-154,共4页Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:评价活血化痰法治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的文献质量。方法:在中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、维普中文科技期刊数据库等中文数据库以及Pub Med、EMBASE等英文数据库中检索自创刊以来到2014年10月有关活血化痰法治疗NAFLD的临床研究文献,运用Jadad评价方法对活血化痰法治疗NAFLD的临床文献进行系统质量评价。结果:在国内外数据库共检索到潜在文献171篇,排除不符合纳入标准的135篇文献,最终纳入36篇文献。运用Jadad方法评价所纳入的36篇文献,其中高质量文献为4篇,占11.1%,低质量文献为32篇,占88.9%。结论:运用活血化痰法治疗非酒精性脂肪肝的中医药临床研究质量参差不齐,有待于进一步提高,使其更具客观化、规范化和科学化。Objective:To evaluate the quality of literature about promoting blood circulation and reducing phlegm method in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD). Methods:Retrieving concerned clinical literature about treatment of NAFLD with promoting blood circulation and reducing phlegm method cited by each of China National Knowledge Internet,Wanfang database,VIP Chinese Periodical database,Pub Med,EMBASE and other databases,since their founding to Oct. 2014,then systemically evaluate the quality of the clinical literature on the basis of evaluation of the Jadad method. Result:171 related literature were retrieved,excluding 135 articles which were not conforming to the criteria,36 literture were eventually included. According to the Jadad evaluation method,the high quality of literature for 4,accounted for 11.1%,while the other 32 pieces were all of low quality and which accounted for 88.9%. Conclusion:The quality of clinical research about promoting blood circulation and reducing phlegm method in the treatment of NAFLD varies differently,and further studies are needed to make it more objective,standardized and scientific.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222