论危险驾驶罪的主观罪过——以《刑法》第十四、十五条为切入点的分析  

The Subjective Crime of Dangerous Driving:An Analysis Based on the 14th and 15th Articles of Criminal Law

作　　者：石奎[1] 胡启忠[2] 

机构地区：[1]西华大学人文学院,成都610039 [2]西南财经大学法学院,成都610074

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第5期103-111,共9页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金2011年度项目"刑罚模式对犯罪界域的制约关系--以罚金刑为视角的分析"(11BFX113)阶段性成果

摘　　要：对于《刑法》第一百三十三条之一的危险驾驶罪主观罪过认定,一些学者基于各自的理解,构建了相应理论,但均无法自圆其说。笔者以《刑法》第十四、十五条为切入点,指出争议的根本症结是对主观罪过理论的不同理解;争议的实质是违背《刑法》总则精神来构建理论;认定的难点是该罪罪过处于间接故意与过于自信过失之间的游离状态。鉴于该罪罪过之性状,可行之路径是切实恪守罪过形式的"一元性"原则,以危害结果为考量点,并结合所掌握的证据进行具体分析。唯此,才能既贯彻宽严相济的刑事政策,也能彰显人权保障的精神。Many researchers have constructed corresponding theories based on their own understanding on the subjective crime of dangerous driving in the 133rd article of criminal law;however all of which are unable to be justified.The author takes the 14th and 15th articles of the criminal law as the starting point,noting that the fundamental crux of the dispute lies in different understandings of the theory of subj ective crime.The essence of the dispute is the construction of theory contrary to the general principles of the criminal law;the difficulty of crime determination is due to the free state of the crime between indirect intentional faults and self-confidence fault.Given the characteristics of the crime,the feasible path is to strictly follow the sole principle of crime forms,take the result of the crime into consideration,and analyze the specific case based on proofs.Only in this way can we implement the criminal policy of combining punishment with leniency,but also guarantee human rights.

关 键 词：《刑法》 危险驾驶罪 主观罪过 刑法语境 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]