论房价调控中宏观调控权的优化及其法治进路  

Improvement of Macro-Regulative Power and Its Legal Approaches on the Case of Estate Price Regulation

作　　者：冯辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2015年第9期104-111,125,共9页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"宪法视野下房地产调控中的‘央地博弈’及其法律规制研究"(13CFX020)的阶段性成果;对外经济贸易大学学科建设专项经费(XK2014410);对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金支持(14YQ10)

摘　　要：宏观调控权的合法性不能仅来自于法律授权,更应凭借实践效果强化权力的正当性。在法治规则上,应平衡中央与地方的不同诉求,重点完善约束中央调控权力的制度建设,并构建及完善调控退出制度。在法治手段及方法上,应合理安排调控措施的时间窗口,从公布到生效应留出合理时间并加强宣传解释;同时明确淡化直至摒弃行政强制手段,增加财政手段和货币手段的地方性和弹性。在法治机制上,应着重通过引入专业机构和公众参与强化并完善调控的绩效评估。The legality of the macro-regulative power cannot solely depend on the authorization form the legislatures, but should show its legality through the practical function. As to the rules, we should keep balance between the central government and local governments by coordinating their different interest demands, and especially improve the legal systems to limit the regulative power of the central government, and comprise the withdrawing system of the concrete regulative methods. As to the approaches and methods, we should arrange the timing window of implementing the regulative methods appropriately, set the reasonable timing table and strengthen the declaring and explanation; meanwhile, we should reduce even drop in the compulsive administrative methods, and promote the localization and flexibility of the government budget methods and financial methods. As to the mechanisms, we should promote the effect valuating of the regulation by introducing the professional institutions and public attendance.

关 键 词：宏观调控权 房价调控 央地关系 调控窗口 调控绩效 

分 类 号：D922.29[政治法律—经济法学]