检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学经济与金融学院,陕西西安710049 [2]西安交通大学管理学院,陕西西安710049 [3]中国传媒大学MBA学院,北京100020
出 处:《当代财经》2015年第9期66-76,共11页Contemporary Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71302144;71172185);教育部人文社科基金项目(11YJA630119)
摘 要:从解决战略联盟中的"边界困境"问题出发,考察了战略联盟的控制机制对联盟协调效率和投机风险的影响,并检验了协调效率和投机风险对联盟成员绩效的不同影响。实证结果显示,正式的契约控制可以有效解决"边界困境"中的投机风险问题,从而提升联盟成员绩效;而非正式的社会控制包括关系控制和信息控制可以有效解决"边界困境"中的协调效率问题,从而提升联盟成员绩效。这进一步丰富和扩展了当前的战略联盟管理文献,为战略联盟成员解决联盟"边界困境"并提升联盟合作绩效提供了重要的实证证据和理论支撑。In order to solve the problem of boundary dilemma in the strategic alliance, this paper firstly examines the impact of the control mechanism in the strategic alliance on the coordinative efficiency and speculative risks of the alliance, and then it tests the different impacts of coordinative efficiency and speculative risks on the performances of the alliance members. The empirical results indicate that the formal contract control can efficiently resolve the problem of speculative risks in the boundary dilemma, so as to improve the performances of the alliance members; whereas the informal social control including relation control and information control can efficiently solve the problem of coordinative efficiency in the boundary dilemma, so as to improve the performance of the alliance members. These findings can enrich and extend the present literatures in strategic alliance management and provide significant empirical evidences and theoretical supports to the strategic alliance members to resolve boundary dilemma and further enhance alliance cooperative performance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117