检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈红[1] 于慧[1] 孔伶俐[1] 衣磊[1] 王金东[1] 周田田[1] 郑占杰[1] 崔维珍[1] 王春霞[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省青岛市精神卫生中心老年科,中国青岛266034
出 处:《国际老年医学杂志》2015年第5期202-205,共4页International Journal of Geriatrics
基 金:青岛市卫生局立项课题资助项目(2010-WSZD109)
摘 要:目的:研究蒙特利尔认知评估量表( MoCA)北京版在青岛市老年人群中应用的可行性以及量表的不足之处。方法:于2011-2012年在青岛市市北区采用MoCA北京版与简易精神状态检查量表( MMSE)对300例老年人进行认知功能测评。结果: MoCA北京版的克朗巴赫α系数( Cronbach’ sα)为0.848、重测信度为0.959、调查员信度为0.966; Mo-CA北京版与MMSE评定结果高度相关(r =0.805,P 〈0.001)。年龄、受教育程度对MoCA总初分的影响有统计学意义。MoCA各项目得分与总分相关系数为0.402-0.769。结论: MoCA量表北京版对青岛市老年人群认知功能的筛查是简便可行的,适合在将来的研究中进一步推广应用。OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of the Beijing version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment ( MoCA) in the elderly people residing in Qingdao in China. METHODS: The stratified random sampling method was used to investigate the population over 60 years old in Qingdao in the year 2011 to 2012 Mini-Mental State Examination ( MMSE) and the Beijing version of MoCA was ad-ministered in all participants. 300 elderly people finished the assessment. RESULTS: The Cronbach’ sαof MoCA was 0. 848. The test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability of MoCA were 0. 959 and 0. 966 respectively. There was the relationship between Beijing version of the MoCA and the MMSE ( r =0. 805,P 〈0. 001 ). There were statistically significant in age and the level of edu-cation on the MoCA total initial points. The correlation coefficient of each item score of MoCA and total score was from 0. 402 to 0. 769. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the Beijing version of MoCA on screening cognitive function is simple and feasible in Qingdao, which is suitable for further application in future studies.
关 键 词:蒙特利尔认知评估量表 简易精神状态检查量表 轻度认知功能障碍 老年
分 类 号:R741[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30