定性系统评价的撰写方法介绍  

How to Write the Qualitative Systematic Review: An Introduction

作　　者：黄崇斐 拜争刚[1,2] 吴淑婷[1,2] 盖琼艳[3] 樊景春[1,2,4] 杨克虎[1,2] Iris Chi 

机构地区：[1]兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州730000 [2]甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室,兰州730000 [3]兰州大学第二医院泌尿外科,兰州730000 [4]武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心,武汉430071 [5]南加州大学社会工作学院美国洛杉矶

出　　处：《中国循证医学杂志》2015年第9期1106-1111,共6页Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81301177);甘肃省留学回国人员科技活动项目择优资助(编号:20410404)

摘　　要：循证医学强调将医师的经验、最佳的研究证据与患者的价值观相结合以保证最佳的防治效果。"证据"是循证医学的核心,定量系统评价能够综合高质量的干预性研究,但不能提供患者的需求、观点与态度等证据综合结果,定性系统评价则可弥补此类不足。随着定性研究及其系统评价方法学的发展,定性研究数量逐年增长并为公共卫生、社会工作、管理学、教育学的循证实践提供证据支持,同时为决策者知证决策提供证据。国际上Cochrane协作网、Campbell协作网和3ie等研究机构已经有成熟的定性系统评价撰写方法,但国内缺少定性系统评价撰写方法介绍。本文将简要介绍定性系统评价的撰写方法。Evidence-based medicine （EBM） emphasizes the combination of the physician＇s experience, the best research evidence and patient＇s values to ensure the best prevention and treatment effect. Evidence is the core of the EBM, and quantitative systematic review can synthesize interventional studies; however, it can＇t provide synthetic evidence for patients＇ demands, opinions and attitudes and so on. Qualitative systematic review can offset these limitations. With the development of methodology of qualitative research and systematic review of qualitative studies, the number of qualitative studies increased year by year and they provided more and more evidence for decision making in public health, social work, management and education. The international research institutions including the Cochrane Collaboration, the Campbell Collaboration and the 3ie have mature methods for qualitative systematic review; however, few studies introduced how to write it in China. Therefore, this paper briefly introduces how to write the qualitative systematic review.

关 键 词：定性研究 定性系统评价 知证决策 

分 类 号：R-03[医药卫生]