检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭雪晴[1] 李雨柳 杨思墨 王婉纯[1] 谢莉莉[1]
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2015年第8期735-736,共2页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:湖北省社会科学基金项目(2012208)
摘 要:目的 探讨亲子冲突、亲子亲合对初中生关系攻击的影响.方法 采用亲子冲突问卷、亲子亲合问卷、关系攻击问卷对392名初中生进行测查.结果 初中生关系攻击总体上较少[(22.52±5.15)分],男生和女生关系攻击得分分别为(22.93±5.43)分,(22.00±4.73)分,初一、初二、初三学生得分分别为(22.72±5.14)分,(22.64±5.67)分,(21.93±4.22)分,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);关系攻击与双亲冲突频率、冲突强度均呈显著正相关(r=0.269,r=0.307,r=0.268,r=0.271,P<0.01),与父子亲合显著负相关(r=-0.171,P<0.01);亲子亲合能显著地负向预测关系攻击(β=-0.123,P<0.05),亲子冲突强度能显著地正向预测关系攻击(β=0.301,P<0.01).结论 亲子冲突、亲子亲和对初中生关系攻击有显著影响.Objective To explore the effects of parent-adolescent conflict and cohesion on relational aggression among junior students.Methods Parent-adolescent Conflict Questionnaires,Parent-adolescent Cohesion Questionnaires,and the Relational Aggression Questionnaires were used in investigating 392 junior students.Results The level of relational aggression of junior students was low (22.52±5.15).There was no differences between relational aggression of male students (22.93± 5.43) and female students (22.00± 4.73) (P〉 0.05),and of grade 1 students(22.72±5.14)and grade 2 students(22.64±5.67),grade 3 students(21.93±4.22) (P〉0.05).The students' relational aggression showed a significantly positive correlation with frequency and intensity of parent-adolescent conflict(r=0.269,r=0.307,r=0.268,r=0.271,P〈0.01),and negative correlation with father-adolescent cohesion(r=-0.171,P〈0.01).Parent-adolescent cohesion was negative predictor of relational aggression(β=-0.123,P〈0.05),and the intensity of parent-adolescent conflict was positive predictor(β=0.301,P〈0.01).Conclusion Parent-adolescent conflict and cohesion have significant effect on relational aggression among junior students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15