检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学传媒与文化学院
出 处:《国际新闻界》2015年第7期6-25,共20页Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication
摘 要:新闻业旨在用新闻专业主义来建构职业的理想和职业规范性理论体系,但随着政治权力与商业权力日久弥深的介入和新技术对传统的渠道霸权的解构,传统的新闻专业主义理论受到多方面的挑战。于上世纪六十年代逐渐兴起的新闻专业主义理论,主要是基于主体中心理性或者工具理性来建构自己的理论框架的,其理论缺陷在网络社会背景下,似难以通过简单的修补得到实现,因此需要新的理论资源。哈贝马斯提出的交往理性,就是重构新闻专业主义理念最可行的理论基石。Journalism is aimed at constructing career ideals and career regulation theory hierarchies by using the journalistic professionalism. However, with the growing involvement of political and commercial powers, and the deconstruction of traditional channel hegemony by new media technology, the traditional journalistic professionalism have been challenged by diverse aspects. The journalistic professionalism theory, which gradually emerged in 1960s, was constructed based on the subject-centered rationality or instrumental rationality. In the network society environment the demerits of this theory can hardly be eliminated by simple mending, and hence new theoretical resources are needed. The concept of communicative rationality, proposed by Habermas, is the most feasible theoretical basement to reconstruct the idea of journalistic professionalism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249