检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院肝胆外科,乌鲁木齐830011
出 处:《中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)》2015年第7期70-72,共3页Chinese Journal of the Frontiers of Medical Science(Electronic Version)
摘 要:目的分析不同外科治疗手段治疗晚期胰腺癌的临床效果及预后,为晚期胰腺癌的临床治疗提供参考。方法选取2010年4月至2012年4月于本院接受治疗的晚期胰腺癌患者46例为研究对象,按照治疗手段不同分为A组和B组。A组患者行射频消融治疗,B组患者行放射性粒子植入治疗。比较两组患者术后并发症发生情况、术后生存率和生存时间。结果 A组患者并发症发生率低于B组,患者术后6个月及12个月生存率低于B组,术后生存时间短于B组,差异均具有显著性(P<0.05)。结论相较于射频消融,放射性粒子植入能够延长晚期胰腺癌患者的生存时间,提高短期生存率,具有较好的临床效果。Objective To analyze the efficacy and prognosis of different surgical treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer, and to provide a refference for clinical treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Method46 cases of patients with Ⅲ or Ⅳ stage advanced pancreatic cancer in our hospital from April 2010 to April 2012 were chose as research subjects, and randomly divided into group A and group B, group A patients were treated with radiofrequency ablation, and group B patients were treated with radioactive seeds implantation. Complications, postoperative survival rate and survival time between the two groups were compared. Result Incidence rate of complications of group A was lower than group B, postoperative survival rate in 6 months and 24 months were lower than group B, postoperative survival time was shorter than group B(P〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with radiofrequency ablation, radioactive seeds implantation could lengthen survival time and improve short-term survival rate, and has better clinical effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28