检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨懿[1] 郭家平[2] 马毅慧[2] 邱建勇[1] 何非[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军169医院口腔科,湖南衡阳421002 [2]广州军区武汉总医院口腔科,湖北武汉430070
出 处:《临床口腔医学杂志》2015年第9期573-575,共3页Journal of Clinical Stomatology
基 金:湖北省自然科学基金(2013CFB433)
摘 要:目的:回顾性研究微创种植技术在老年患者中应用的临床效果。方法:回访2009-2014年接受种植手术的老年患者79人,男49人,女30人,平均年龄67岁,植入种植体97颗,分为微创组和常规组。微创组35例,男23例,女12例,植入种植体47颗。常规组44例,男28例,女16例,植入种植体50颗。对比手术时间、术后疼痛反应,术后出血、肿胀及种植手术成功率,评价临床效果。结果:对比术后反应发生率,微创组明显少于常规组,种植手术成功率基本接近,两组间比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:在条件允许情况下,微创种植手术更适合老年患者应用,临床效果确定。Objective: To retrospectively study the clinical effect of minimally invasive implant technology in the elderly patients was. Method: Retrospectively study the elderly patients who received 79 implant surgery, 49 men, 30 women, the average age of 67 years, and 97 implants total. Flapless group: 35 people, including 23 men, 12 female, 47 implants. Conventional surgery group: 44 people, 28 male, 16 female, 50 implants. To evaluate the clinical effect of Operation time, Postoperative pain, Postoperative bleeding, Postoperative swelling and implant success after comparison. Result: Compared with the results of the groups, the flapless group was significantly better than that of the conventional flap group, and the success rate of the implants was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: The flapless technique is suitable for the elderly patients, and the clinical effect is definitive.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.232.234