古代文学研究的“正”“反”“合”  

Study on the Positive,Opposite and Whole of the Classical Literature

作　　者：方丽萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]青海师范大学,西宁810008

出　　处：《阅江学刊》2015年第4期108-114,共7页Yuejiang Academic Journal

摘　　要：综合考察古代文学生成的时、空背景以及现代学术史成果可知,今天的古代文学研究依然有较大的空间。作家的童年经历及个性心理特征,民族文化心理、民族、国家认同等等一些最基本、最普遍的问题还没有得到很好的解决。古代文学发展过程中的矛盾、对立面普遍存在,那些或处于弱势,或与当下价值观相左的一面,如俗、非主流、文学的想象性等往往被我们忽略。文学史"层累叠加"的发展方式决定了文学现象是交融错杂的,二元对立的思维方式不适于文学研究。以融通的眼光、稍微转换一下视角会发现大量的研究"生地",如"夹缝时代"、"死亡书写"、异域、异族想象等。要摆脱长期养成的"路径依赖",以开阔的视野,复杂性思维方式去发现文学研究的新的增长点,真正提升古代文学的研究品格。After comprehensive researching on the time and space background of the generated classical literature and the result of modern academic history,we can know that there is still room for the development of classical literature research. First of all,some of the most basic,the most common problem has not been solved,such as the childhood experience,individual psychological characteristics,ethnic and cultural psychology of the author. Secondly,the development process of classical literatures contains a large number of contradictory opposites,and those which in a weak position or opposite to the current value tends to be overlooked,such as vulgar,non-mainstream or imaginary literature. Third,the development pattern of literary history is accumulative superposition which determines that the literary phenomenon is mingled and complex. It also leads to the conclusion that two-dimension thinking does not apply on the research of classical literatures. There can be found much research of ＂virgin soil＂,such as： ＂the crevice of the times＂,＂death writing＂,exotic,alien imagination,if using accommodating vision and changing the sight to observe the literature. We must snap out of the long habit-＂path dependence＂,and find a new growth point of literary studies though a broad perspective and the complexity thinking,then indeed improve the research character of classical literature.

关 键 词：古代文学研究 矛盾对立 交叉互渗 品格提升 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]