检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈学权[1]
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院
出 处:《法学评论》2015年第5期118-129,共12页Law Review
基 金:国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心的研究成果;教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(项目批准号:12YJC820011)资助
摘 要:在我国刑事审判实践中,法庭驱逐辩护律师的案例时常发生。法庭将严重扰乱法庭秩序的辩护律师驱逐出庭,符合我国《刑事诉讼法》等有关规定,具有正当的法理基础,也是法治国家的通行做法。但是,我国法庭严重地滥用了驱逐辩护律师的权力,应当完善法庭驱逐辩护律师的程序机制,并妥善解决辩护律师被驱逐后引发的被告人辩护权之保障问题。The court often expels defense counsel in the practice of criminal trial in China. The court expels defense counsel who seriously disrupt the order of the court, Which conforms to the relevant provisions of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law, has a legitimate legal basis, and is a common practice in the countries of the rule of law. The court severely abused the power of expelling defense lawyer. It is necessary to improve procedures mechanisms of the court expelling defense counsel and properly resolve the issue to protect the right to defense of the accused whose defense counsel is expelled by the court.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.147.87