检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾晶[1]
出 处:《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第5期150-155,共6页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"企业集中行为的反垄断法调整问题"(12BFX098)
摘 要:企业间的诸多因素,如企业数量、企业对称性、生产能力、以及结构联系,对它们达成或维持协调行为或一致行动很重要。因此,在判定企业是否具有共同支配地位时,必须充分考虑到这些因素,方能确保判断的准确性。目前我国反垄断执法尚未完全掌握这一考察方法,因而今后应充分借鉴相关国家的成熟经验,尽早探寻出一套契合我国国情的共同支配地位判定方法。Many factors among enterprises, such as the number of enterprises, enterprises symmetry, production capacity, as well as structural links, are considerably important for enterprises to reach or maintain the coordinated behavior or concerted action. Therefore, when determining whether the enterprise occupies a collective dominant position, we must take full account of these factors in order to ensure the accuracy of judgment. At present, China's anti-monopoly enforcement has not fully grasped this in- spection method, so China should fully draw lessons from the mature experience of relevant countries in the future, and explore a set of methods to determine collective dominance which is perfectly suited to China's national conditions as soon as possible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145