检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨媛[1]
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2015年第25期126-127,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的分析比较不同术式在儿童V型斜视治疗中的效果。方法 20例V型斜视儿童分别采用下斜肌后徙术、下斜肌切断术、下斜肌部分截除术进行治疗,4个月后比较不同术式的治疗效果以及下斜肌功能改善情况。结果用不同术式进行治疗的患者手术后的治疗效果均有了不同程度的提高,下斜肌功能也都有了不同程度的改善,比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在临床治疗儿童V型斜视时,应选取最合适的手术方法对患者进行治疗,同时要严格把握手术与适应证,才能起到满意的治疗效果。Objective To analyze and compare the therapeutic effect of different surgical treatment for children with V strabismus. Methods 20 cases of children with V strabismus were used inferior oblique recession, inferior oblique amputation, inferior oblique part resection for treatment, to compare the therapeutic effect of different surgical treatment and inferior oblique function improvement after 4 months. Results The effect of the patients treated by different operation has different degrees of improvement, inferior oblique function also have different degrees of improvement, differences had no statistical significance (P〉0.05). Conclusion In the clinical treatment of children with V strabismus, we should choose the most appropriate surgical method, also strictly grasp the operation and indications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38