检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东南大学医学院附属盐城医院神经内科,江苏省盐城市224001
出 处:《实用老年医学》2015年第7期590-592,共3页Practical Geriatrics
摘 要:目的评价加巴喷汀和卡马西平治疗新诊断的老年癫的有效性和保留率。方法将47例新诊断的老年癫患者随机分为加巴喷汀组和卡马西平组,分别予以加巴喷汀或卡马西平治疗,观察并比较2组发作控制情况和药物的保留率差异。结果治疗48周加巴喷汀组药物保留率为79.2%,卡马西平组为47.8%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。加巴喷汀组总有效率为75.0%,卡马西平组总有效率为69.6%,2组比较,差异无统计学意义。结论加巴喷汀治疗老年癫与卡马西平疗效相当,48周的药物保留率显著高于卡马西平,提示加巴喷汀可作为治疗老年癫的一线药物。Objective To observe the efficacy and retention rate of gabapentin and carbamazepine in elderly patients with newly-diagnosed epilepsy. Methods Forty-seven elderly patients with newly-diagnosed epilepsy were randomized to receive either gabapentin (24 cases) or carbamazepine (23 cases). Seizure control and drug retention rate were used to evaluate the curative effect. Results Retention rate followed by a 48-week treatment period in the gabapentin group was 79. 2%, compared with 47. 8% in the carbamazepine group. The difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). There was no significant difference in the seizure control between the gabapentin group (75.0%) and the carbamazepine group (69. 6%). Conclusions Gabapentin and carbamazepine have similar effects in elderly patients with newly-diagnosed ep- ilepsy. However, gabapentin is superior to carbamazepine in the retention rate, which could be recommended as a first-line drug in these patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112