检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐庚池[1] 韩耀辉[1] 牟兰[1] 葛振林[1]
机构地区:[1]兰州大学口腔医学院正畸科,甘肃兰州730000
出 处:《口腔医学研究》2015年第9期898-900,共3页Journal of Oral Science Research
基 金:甘肃省科技计划项目(编号1208RJZA209)
摘 要:目的:研究位点保存术对正畸拔牙间隙关闭过程中出现牙龈折痕的影响,以评价该技术在临床应用的可行性。方法:选择对称性拔除双侧第一前磨牙的正畸病例3例,6对牙齿,采用自身左右对照。随机选取一侧进行位点保存,另一侧拔牙后进行常规处理,作为对照,术后6周开始正畸治疗。选用牙周探针进行测量,对比两组牙龈折痕的发生情况。结果:对照组上颌1例患者,下颌所有患者中均出现牙龈折痕,实验组观察到牙龈折痕的出现。结论:位点保存术能够对抗拔牙窝的萎缩,有效的预防牙龈折痕的发生。Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of alveolar ridge preservation techniques and the etlects on gmglvai invagination during orthodontic space closure after tooth extraction. Methods: Three adult patients with 6 pairs of teeth were involved and first premolars were symmetrically extracted. One side was randomly selected to implant bio-oss hone material and cover bio-gide collagen membrane (experiment group), while the other side underwent the conventional orthodontic process (control group). After six--week treatment, the incidence of gingival invagination was evaluated using periodontal probe, respectively. Results: In the control group, gingival invagination occurred in the maxilla of one patient and mandible of all patients. However, there was no gingival invagination in the experimental group. Conclusion: Site preservation technique could effectively avoid the atrophy of tooth sockets and gingival invagination.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30