检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张兴贵[1]
机构地区:[1]广东外语外贸大学商学院,广东广州510420
出 处:《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》2015年第5期114-122,共9页Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"人力资源系统与员工幸福感研究"(14BGL076);教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目"员工何以会感到幸福或不幸福:特质与情境对幸福感的交互作用及其路径"(13YJA630135);广东省哲学社会科学规划项目"情绪劳动;文化取向与工作满意度"(GD10CGL16)
摘 要:结合实验操纵和测量的方法探讨了社会比较和人格特质对主观幸福感的影响。研究表明,社会比较充当了神经质人格影响主观幸福感的中介变量。向下比较提升了对能力和心境的自我评价,向上比较降低了对能力和心境的自我评价。无论何种比较方向,高神经质组比低神经质组对社会比较更敏感,对主观幸福感的影响也更大。就外倾性人格来说,能力和心境的自我评价均明显受到比较方向的影响,向下比较提升了对能力和心境的自我评价,向上比较降低了对能力和心境的自我评价。社会比较充当了人格影响心境的中介,并没有充当人格影响能力自我评价的中介。Subjective well-being (SWB) is an important comprehensive psychological index for measuring the people's life satisfaction. Combining measurement research with experimental research, this paper analyzes the interactive effects of social comparison and personality on subjective well-being, esp. a possible cognitive mechanism through which the personality traits influence SWB. The results indicate that social comparison serves as the intermediary in which the traits of neuroticism influence subjective well-being, downward comparison would promote their well-being, and their well-being would be reduced from a present upward comparison. For any instance, individuals with high neuroticism are more sensitivity to social comparison than those with low neuroticism, so subjective well-being would be influenced evidently. As for traits extraversion, the main effect for extraversion and social comparison to happiness are obvious, but interaction effect is not significant, and it indicates that social comparison does not act as the intermediary in which the traits of extraversion influences SWB.
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175