检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省口腔医院正畸科,广州510280 [2]西安恒惠科技有限公司,西安710075 [3]广东省口腔医院牙周病科,广州510280
出 处:《华西口腔医学杂志》2015年第5期500-503,共4页West China Journal of Stomatology
摘 要:目的探讨数字化托槽模拟定位的准确性。方法对15例数字化牙颌模型上的牙齿(每例28颗)进行托槽模拟定位,定位方法分别采用托槽高度定位法和含牙根信息托槽定位法。采用Ortho Rx软件形成矫治后的最终状态;采用美国正畸目标评分系统(ABO-OGS)评估矫治结果,测量指标包括牙齿排齐、后牙边缘嵴高度及牙根平行度3项。结果 1)虚拟矫治后两种托槽定位方法的边缘嵴高度扣分均小于治疗前(P<0.05),但两种方法虚拟矫治后边缘嵴高度扣分没有统计学差异(P>0.05)。2)含牙根信息托槽定位法虚拟矫治后牙根平行度扣分小于托槽高度定位法,但两种方法虚拟矫治前后牙根平行度未发生明显改善。3)在牙齿排齐及3项总扣分方面,两种托槽定位方法在虚拟矫治前后扣分的差异有统计学意义,矫治后扣分均小于治疗前,含牙根信息托槽定位法矫治后的扣分小于托槽高度定位法(P<0.05)。结论在重建的包含牙根的三维数字化模型上,采用Ortho Rx软件,通过托槽高度定位法及含牙根信息定位法进行托槽定位,模拟矫治均有效果;通过含牙根信息托槽定位法的模拟矫治效果更好。Objective This study was performed to determine the feasibility of digital virtual positioning of braces in clinical applications. Methods We determined the positions of brackets in 28 teeth of 15 cases according to positioning methods that use bracket height or root information. Final status was generated by OrthoRx software. Treatment results were assessed with American board of orthodontics objective grading system (ABO-OGS). Results The deduction points in the marginal ridge height were significantly decreased after treatment using the two methods (P〈0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was found in the deduction points in the marginal ridge height between the two methods (P〉0.05). No improvement was found in the deduction points in root parallelism with both methods. No statistical significance was found in the deduction points in root parallelism before and after treatments using both methods. The deduction points in alignment and the three scoring components were significantly decreased after treatment using the two positioning methods. In addition, statistically significant differences were found in the deduction points in alignment between two methods (P〈0.05). Conclusion By using OrthoRx software, we achieved effective therapeutic treatment in reconstructing three-dimensional digital modes using two different bracket-positioning methods. The positioning method that used root information is more accurate compared with the bracket height positioning method. This study provides an experimental basis for bracket accuracy in the mouth.
关 键 词:托槽定位 美国正畸目标评分系统 间接粘接 自锁托槽
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30