检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘梦璐[1]
机构地区:[1]南开大学法学院,天津300071
出 处:《天津商业大学学报》2015年第5期66-72,共7页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"中国国际私法实证研究"(10YJA820082)
摘 要:中日两国同作为亚洲的大陆法系国家,在国际私法立法、司法实践和基本理论方面有诸多相似之处。以国际私法中合同准据法确认制度为切入点,多角度比较两国在涉外合同方面的法律适用问题,尤其是"受特殊保护的合同"——消费者合同和劳动合同的准据法确定问题,对于进一步完善我国合同冲突法立法具有重要意义。中国将来立法应当关注合同准据法确认时的实质平等,而日本则有必要进一步完善意思自治的细节。As the civil law countries in Asia, China and Japan have a lot in common in legislation, judicial practice and basic theory of private international law. Starting from the system of applicable law of contract in private international law, the paper makes a comparative study of how the laws are applied in terms of foreign contract in two countries, especially how to determine the applicable laws of the "specially protected contracts" such as consumer contract and employment contract, which is important for China to perfect legislation of contractual conflict. As far as legislation is concerned, China should pay more attention to substantive equality when defining the proper law while Japan is expected to refine the details of party autonomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249