论法治视野下的非法证据排除规则  

Studies on the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence in context of rule of law construction

作　　者：杨宇冠[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院

出　　处：《证据科学》2015年第4期389-399,共11页Evidence Science

基　　金：2011计划司法文明协同创新中心研究成果;教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"非法证据排除规则在中国的实施问题研究"(批准号:11JJD820016)的成果之一;中国法学会部级法学研究重点课题"完善人权司法保障制度研究"(课题编号:CLS(2014)B07)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：非法证据排除规则是法治的组成部分,其顺利实施离不开法治大环境,否则不可能真正得到实施;非法证据排除规则的实施又是法治的重要内容,起到了完善法治的作用,特别是保障个人宪法权利的作用。法治建设需要高素质的司法队伍,中国的检察官在建设法治和实施非法证据排除规则方面发挥特别重要作用。司法改革之目的应当是建设法治社会,也是实施非法证据排除规则的动力。非法证据排除规则与刑事司法其他规则之间是互相促进、互相配合的关系。我国确立非法证据排除规则之后,实施中出现了一些问题,包括各地非法证据排除案件数量较少,程序不清楚、证明标准不明确、结果难以认定等。唯有与法治建设协同推进,上述问题才能得到根本解决。The exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence is a component of the rule of law, while the rule of law is the condition of implementation of the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence. In the year 2012, China＇s criminal procedure law firstly adopted the exclusionary rule of illegal obtained evidence. Since then, some questions has emerged in its implementation, e.g. the number of the cases is small, the suppressing process is imperfect, and the standard of proof is not clear. The improvement of the exclusionary rule depends on the macro and micro conditions, among which the former ones are the rule of law, strict enforcement of law, and judicial reform; the latter ones are the development of other rules in criminal justice.

关 键 词：法治建设 非法证据排除 司法改革 发展完善 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]