《经济、社会和文化权利国际公约》在陆港两地的司法适用  

The Judicial Application of ICESCR in The Mainland and Hong Kong

作　　者：张雪莲[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第9期21-26,共6页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：江苏省法学会法学研究项目(SFH2014C11);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目(2014SJD030)

摘　　要：《经济、社会和文化权利国际公约》在国内的司法适用,是陆港两地在履约过程中面临的共同问题。与《宪法》和《基本法》相比,《公约》规定的权利范围更广泛,内容更全面,是缔约国公民保护自身权利的重要依据。虽然《公约》在香港法律体系中的地位并不明确,但香港法院还是在援引《公约》解释《基本法》和社会立法方面进行了一些尝试,并对审查标准进行了一些有益探索。与香港相比,《公约》在大陆的司法适用面临更多困难。我们一方面可以加大《公约》向国内立法的转化力度,在相关社会立法的司法适用中援引《公约》作为法律解释的依据,在现有制度框架下寻求《公约》司法适用的可能性;另一方面也要为未来《公约》的广泛适用创造条件并做好理论准备。The judicial application of ICESCR in the domestic law is a common problem facing the mainland and Hong Kong in the compliance process. In comparison with the 'Constitution'and the 'basic law',the ICESCR provides a wider range of rights with more comprehensive contents,which make it an important basis for the protection of the citizens' rights. Although its position is not clear in the Hong Kong legal system,the Hong Kong courts are attempting to invoke ICESCR to interpret the ' basic law' and the social legislation,and have made some beneficial explorations into the review standard. Compared with Hong Kong,the application of the ICESCR faces more difficulties in the mainland. On the one hand,we should increase the transformation of the covenant rights into the domestic legislation,citing the ICESCR as the legal basis of the interpretation of the relevant social legislation to seek the possibility of judicial application in the existing institutional framework. On the other hand,the conditions for the wide use of the ICESCR should also be prepared.

关 键 词：公约 香港 大陆 司法适用 

分 类 号：D815.7[政治法律—国际关系]