论危险犯的既遂后自动恢复  

Automatic Recovery of Dangerous Criminal After Accomplishment

作　　者：闫雨[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东警官学院法律系

出　　处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2015年第5期91-95,共5页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

基　　金：2015年广州市哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目(15G51);广东警官学院青年骨干教师培养计划资助(2015QNGG01)

摘　　要：危险犯作为我国刑法分则中存在的一种犯罪类型,往往以危险状态的出现作为其既遂的标志。对危险犯既遂后,行为人主动消除危险状态的行为性质,学界存在"犯罪中止说"和"酌定量刑情节说"两种学说。"犯罪中止说"有违刑法的基本原则与基本理念,容易造成理论上的混乱。"酌定量刑情节说"会导致刑罚过重,有违罪责刑相适应原则,有违刑法的谦抑性。这种行为应是一种典型的既遂后自动恢复行为。承认既遂后自动恢复,有利于维护刑法理论、实现司法公正。我国在今后的立法中应当对既遂后自动恢复予以明确。The dangerous criminal as a type of crime in our criminal law often exists with the presence of a dangerous condition as its symbol. There is a big controversy on the nature of the behavior that the perpetrator is initiative to eliminate the dangerous condition after accomplishment of dangerous criminal. The academia mainly has two theories ＂crime suspension＂ and ＂discretionary sentencing＂ . ＂Crime suspension＂ is contrary to the fundamental principles and the basic concept of criminal law and likely to cause confusion in theory. ＂Discretionary sentencing＂ will lead to heavy penalties, which is contrary to adapting the principles of criminal culpability and the Criminal Law of Modesty. This behavior should be automatically restored after the behavior of a typical accomplishment. Recognizing automatic restoration after consummation is conducive to maintaining the criminal law theory for achieving justice. Our country should be clear to automatic resuming after accomplishment in future legislation.

关 键 词：危险犯 危险状态 既遂后自动恢复 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]