检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津商业大学法学院,天津300134 [2]天津市红桥区人民检察院,天津300130
出 处:《河北法学》2015年第10期140-149,共10页Hebei Law Science
基 金:国家社科基金项目<检察侦查权监督制约机制研究>(12CFX041)的阶段性成果之一
摘 要:从1992年开始,俄罗斯通过修法和立法逐步确立审前羁押司法审查制度。俄罗斯审前羁押司法审查制度发展历程艰辛,在权力博弈等诸多因素影响下,采渐进主义进路。但审前羁押司法审查的实践效果不尽如人意,其最主要原因在于长期以来俄罗斯司法独立程度不高。俄罗斯审前羁押司法审查的立法与实践经验对于具有类似司法传统的我国极具参考价值。Beginning in 1992, the system of judicial review of pretrial detention had been gradually established through legislation and the law amending in Russia. The developing process of this system was very difficultly. The gradualist approach had been adopted under the power game and many other factors. However, the practices result of this system is not satisfactory. The degree of judicial independence was long been not high was the most important reason. The Russia's experiences have significant references to the perfection of Chinese related legal system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117