检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学商学院,江苏南京210093 [2]江西外语外贸职业学院会计系,江西南昌330025
出 处:《华东经济管理》2015年第10期44-51,共8页East China Economic Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(71402068)
摘 要:文章以2006-2013年我国A股上市公司为样本,试图从影响内部控制的"隐性"因素入手,探讨实施股权激励是否能够加强高管提高内部控制有效性的动机,并分析高管权力对股权激励效果的影响。研究发现:股权激励与内部控制质量之间呈显著的正相关关系,具体为实施股权激励后,公司内部控制质量有所提高;且激励程度越高,内部控制质量越好;相较于股票期权的形式,限制性股票激励更能够促进内部控制质量的提高。进一步研究发现:实施股权激励后,较大的高管权力强化了股权激励对内部控制的治理效果。Taking A-share listed companies in China from 2006 to 2013 as samples, the paper attempts to start from the 'recessive' factors that 'affect internal control, explores whether the implementation of equity incentive can strengthen the motivation of top-management to improve the effectiveness of internal control, and analyzes the impact of top-management power on equity incentive. The study shows that equity incentive has a significant positive impact on internal control quality. Specifically, the internal control quality is improved 'after the implementation of equity incentive. The higher the level of equi- ty incentive, the better the quality of internal control. Compared to the fornl of stock options, the restricted stock incentive can promote more improvement of the quality of internal control. Further study finds that the larger top-management power strengthens the governance effect of equity incentive on internal control after the implementation of equity incentive.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3