低碳调控体系中低碳监管与其他调控模式的关系  

Relations between Low-carbon Supervision and Other Regulatory Modes in Low-carbon Regulatory System

作　　者：王占洲[1] 林苇[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州警官职业学院,贵州贵阳550005

出　　处：《贵州警官职业学院学报》2015年第5期3-9,共7页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"应对气候变化的行政法问题研究"(11AFX011)

摘　　要：政府通过低碳行政监管从外部对市场进行直接的、微观的行政干预,是为了弥补其他调控模式的缺陷,使低碳行政监管与之构成更具效率的低碳调控体系。立法控制需要低碳监管弥补其所具有的相对滞后性;司法诉讼需要低碳监管弥补其所具有的相对被动性;低碳经济的国有化需要低碳监管调和其低竞争性;自律监管需要低碳行政监管引导其作用方向和巩固其效能。By means of low-carbon administrative supervision, the government conducts direct and microscopic interventions on the market from the outside, trying to remedy the defects of other regulatory models and form a comprehensive and more efficient low-carbon regulatory system. Low-carbon supervision is needed to make up for the relatively lagging legislative control as well as the relative passivity possessed by judicial litigation. Moreover, the nationalization of low-carbon economy needs low-carbon supervision to reconcile its low competitiveness, while selfdiscipline supervision needs it to guide the direction and consolidate the effectiveness.

关 键 词：低碳调控体系 低碳监管 其他调控模式 关系 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]