检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学政府管理学院,北京100081 [2]中国政法大学外国语学院,北京102200
出 处:《管理观察》2015年第26期73-76,79,共5页Management Observer
摘 要:我国的经济转型期涌现出大量社会纠纷案件,很多还涉及政府部门,而正式的法律和诉讼难以满足纠纷解决的需求,建立一种法治基础上的诉讼外纠纷解决机制势在必行。国外的ADR(替代性纠纷解决)作为诉讼外纠纷解决方式总称,对改进我国社会治理结构、有效化解纠纷具有较强的借鉴意义。本文针对行政纠纷问题,通过梳理国外ADR的作用机制及特点,并分析NGO(非政府组织)参与江苏省灌云县房屋拆迁纠纷解决的典型案例,探讨了我国诉讼外行政纠纷解决机制面临的挑战。Large amounts of social disputes emerge in times of economic transition period in China,with many involving governmental agencies.Formal lawsuits could not meet the demand of resolving the disputes; therefore it is imperative to establish dispute resolution mechanism out of court proceedings but on the law-of-rule basis.ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution),as an out-of-court dispute resolution approach,has strong reference significance in improving social governance and effectively resolving a variety of disputes.This paper takes a farm house dismantling dispute occurred in Jiangsu Province as a case.Focusing on the administrative disputes resolution with government as a client and by reviewing functions and practices of the ADR in foreign countries,this research examines the challenges that China is confronting in terms of improving the out-of-court dispute resolution.
关 键 词:ADR(替代性纠纷解决) 调解 诉讼 法治
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3