机构地区:[1]临汾山西师范大学体育学院,041000 [2]北京体育大学研究生院 [3]湛江国家体育总局湛江潜水运动学校 [4]北京体育大学运动医学教研室
出 处:《中华物理医学与康复杂志》2015年第10期721-726,共6页Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2012BS009)
摘 要:目的观察恒强旋转磁场对骨折愈合过程中骨形态蛋白-2(BMP-2)和血小板源性生长因子(PDGFs)在骨折部位不同时间表达的变化,探讨恒强旋转磁场促进骨折愈合的机制。方法将80只建立股骨闭合性骨折模型的Sprague Dawley(SD)大鼠按随机数字表法分为磁场干预组和对照组,每组40只。磁场干预组大鼠置于0.4T恒强旋转磁场(浙江康尔医疗器械公司)中,磁体旋转频率6Hz,每日磁场干预1次,每次连续30min,每周6次;对照组未做任何干预处理。分别于骨折后2、3、4和8周四个观察时间点(每个时间点10只大鼠),观察各组大鼠骨折部位BMP-2、PDGF—A和PDGF—B免疫组化染色阳性表达,并采用Nikon显微成像分析仪(Nikon 50i,日本)拍照(图像放大400倍),用生物图像分析处理软件测量阳性染色区域的积分光密度值(IOD)。采用双因素方差分析比较时间、磁场的主效应及二者的交互效应。结果①不同时间点各组大鼠骨折部位BMP-2阳性表达的IOD值比较,差异有统计学意义(F=21.58,P〈0.01),多重比较显示,BMP-2阳性染色区域在骨折后2、3和4周时的IOD值均明显高于骨折后8周(P〈0.01),骨折后4周的IOD值亦明显高于骨折后2周(P〈0.01);磁场干预与时间存在有交互作用(F=3.17;P〈0.05)。②磁场干预组与对照组大鼠不同时间点间骨折部位的PDGF-A阳性表达IOD比较,差异有统计学意义(F=28.16,P〈0.01),多重比较显示,骨折后2周骨折部位PDGF—A的阳性表达的IOD值显著高于骨折后3周(P〈0.01)、4周(P〈0.01)和8周(P〈0.01),骨折后3周和4周PDGF-A的阳性表达IOD也显著高于骨折后8周(P〈0.01)。③磁场干预组骨折部位的PDGF—B阳性表达IOD值明显高于对照组[磁场干预组(57.6±2.1)vs对照组(50.11±2.22)],差异有统计学意义(F=5.98,P〈0.0Objective To evaluate the effect rotation constancy static magnetic field(RCSMF) on the expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs) in fracture healing, and elucidate the possible mechanism of RCSMF promoting fracture healing. Methods A total of 80 rats with femur closed fracture were randomly divided into a magnetic treatment group (M) and a control group (C). The M group was given RCSMF treatment 30 minutes per day, 6 times per week, using 0.4 T 6 Hz magnetic field, while the C group was not given any intervention. Femurs and calluses were subjected to BMP-2, PDGF-A and PDGF-B immunohistochemistry assay at 2, 3, 4 and 8 weeks after the treatment. The integrated optical density (IOD) of positive staining was calculated. Two-factor variance analysis was used to compare the main effect of time, treatment and that of their interaction. Results For both groups, the IOD of immunoreactivity of BMP-2 at 2, 3 and 4 weeks after the treatment was significantly higher than that 8 weeks after the treatment, and the value at four weeks after the intervention was also significantly higher than that at 2 weeks after it. There was a significant interaction effect of time × treatment of BMP-2 ( F = 3.17, P 〈 0.05 ). Significant differences were observed in the IOD of positive staining PDGF-A at different time points for both groups : the value at 2 weeks after treatment was significantly higher than that at 3, 4 and 8 weeks after the treatment, and that at 3 and 4 weeks after treatment was also significantly higher than that at 8 weeks after the treatment. The IOD of positive staining PDGF-B of the M group (57.6 ±2.1 ) was significantly higher than that of the C group (50.11 ±2.22, P 〈 0.05). There was significant difference in the IOD of positive staining PDGF-B (F =50.06,P 〈0.01) at different time points: the IOD of positive staining PDGF-B at 3 weeks after treatment was significantly higher than that at 2 and 8 weeks group
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...