检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑潇[1]
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042
出 处:《兰州文理学院学报(社会科学版)》2015年第5期37-41,共5页Journal of Lanzhou University of Arts and Science(Social Science Edition)
基 金:华东政法大学社会治理研究院"检察机关提起公益诉讼的国际经验分析及政策建议"(B-6001-12-0170237)成果
摘 要:在我国,由检察机关提起行政公益诉讼以维护公共利益具有正当性和可行性。首先,现代诉权理论的发展为检察机关介入行政公益诉讼提供了法理依据;其次,我国现有立法为其提供了一定的法律基础;再次,检察机关拥有行政公益诉权是其公诉职能的应有之义;最后,公民、社会团体在行政公益诉讼中的局限性使赋予检察机关原告资格具有必要性。In our country, public administrative proceedings sued by the prosecution in order to safeguard the public inter- est is justified and feasible. Firstly, the development of the modern prosecution's theory provides a legal basis for public administrative proceedings; Secondly, our existing legislation provides some legal basis; Thirdly, the prosecution has the right to appeal to the administrative public interest, which is the proper functioning of its public prosecution justice; Fi- nally, civil, society and organizations have difficulties in public administrative proceedings, which gives the need to qualify the prosecution' s plaintiff.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38