检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学法学院,天津300071 [2]天津市高级人民法院,天津300071
出 处:《湖南警察学院学报》2015年第3期5-13,共9页Journal of Hunan Police Academy
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学青年基金项目"指导性案例的创制技术与适用方法研究"(12YJC820096)
摘 要:天津宅基地纠纷是在城镇化进程加快、土地制度变革的背景下涌现的,引发纠纷的既有政府权力主导城镇化建设的外部原因,也有制度建构过程中国家层面"大传统"与乡村社会"小传统"冲突的内在原因。基层法院在社会变迁和法律冲突的背景下扮演的不仅仅是规则的适用者,还是矛盾的化解者,分担着基层治理、乡村建设的职能。在审理宅基地案件时,基层法院除了适用法律规则,还应兼顾实质理性,重点考虑政策,并谋求国家法与村规民约的合作。With the accelerating of urban construction and changing of land system, house sites disputes has been emerged these years in Tianjin. Government’s promoting urban construction is the external cause of these disputes, while the conflicts between public legal rules and village rules are the internal causes. In the context of social change and conflicts between legal rules and village rules, local courts do not only apply law but also try to resolve disputes, so that they can help to rule local society and accelerate urban construction. In order to settle these disputes, local courts do not only apply legal rules, but also take consideration of state policies and village rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.191