检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属医院口腔科,江苏镇江212001 [2]南京医科大学口腔疾病研究江苏省重点实验室 [3]南京医科大学口腔医学院种植修复科,江苏南京210029
出 处:《口腔医学》2015年第10期850-853,共4页Stomatology
基 金:江苏省高校优势学科建设工程(2014-37)
摘 要:目的评估短种植体在较低牙槽骨高度上颌后牙区使用的临床效果,探讨其使用价值。方法 2009—2011年,选取窦底骨高度为3~6 mm患者26例,共植入37枚短种植体,随访25~48个月(平均36个月),回顾其临床及影像资料,采用Buser和Cochran存留标准评估短种植体存留率。结果 37枚短种植体一例修复前失败,成功率97.3%。复查X线片种植体颈部边缘骨吸收均小于1.5 mm。结论对于窦底骨高度严重受限的病例(3 mm≤高度≤6 mm),短种植体可以取得良好的且与常规长度种植体相同的稳定性。Objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy of short implant used in the marginal bone loss posterior regions and to discuss the use value of the short implant. Methods A retrospective study design was adopted. The clinical and radiographic data of 37 short implants in 26 patients( 3 mm≤bone height≤6 mm) from 2009 to 2011 were collected after 25 to 48( mean 36) months' followup to estimate the clinical result. The survival rate was evaluated according to Buser and Cochran'S survival criteria. Results The overall cumulative survival rate was found to be 97. 3% and 1 case early failure before restoration in the maxillary molar region was observed. The mean loss in margin bone height was less than 1. 5 mm. Conclusions In the case of low alveolar ridge height of maxillary posterior region( 3 mm≤H≤6 mm),survival rate of short implants over an average period of 36 months was favorable and comparable with longer implants.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.171.199