检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈志明[1] 陈晓珏[1] 薛强[1] 季斌[1] 施健[1] 陈不尤[1] 马剑波[1]
机构地区:[1]南通大学附属医院肿瘤放疗科,江苏省226001
出 处:《江苏医药》2015年第20期2423-2425,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的观察奈达铂周剂量化疗同步放疗治疗老年食管癌的疗效。方法 83例老年食管癌患者随机分为两组:A组41例,采用周剂量奈达铂30mg/m2化疗5周和同步放疗;B组42例,单纯放疗。比较两组疗效及不良反应。结果A组治疗有效率高于B组(85.4%vs.71.4%)(P<0.05)。随访2.3-75.0个月,随访率达96.4%。A组1、3、5年无进展生存率及1、3、5年总生存率均高于B组(P<0.01)。A组白细胞下降2-3级及血小板下降发生率均高于B组(P<0.05),但两组均未出现4级不良反应。结论奈达铂周剂量化疗同步放疗治疗老年食管癌疗效好;虽然加重骨髓抑制,但耐受性良好。Objective To observe the efficacy of nedaplatin(NDP)-weekly chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy in treating elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma.Methods Eightythree elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma were randomly divided into two groups of A(NDP 30mg/m2 weekly for 5 weeks combined with radiotherapy,41cases)and B(radiotherapy alone,42cases).Clinical efficacy and adverse effects were compared between two groups.Results Effective rate was higher in group A than that in group B(85.4%vs.71.4%)(P〈0.05).The patients were followed up for 2.3-75.0months with 96.4% of follow-up rate.Progress free survival rate and overall survival rate in the 1st,3rd and 5th year in group A were higher than those in group B(P〈0.01).Incidences of leukocyte decrease at 2-3level and platelet descend in group A were higher than those in group B(P〈0.05),but there were no 4level of adverse effects in two groups.Conclusion NDP-weekly chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy has better efficacy than radiotherapy alone in treating elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma.The bone marrow suppression is increased,but is well tolerated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229