地方性刑事诉讼规则研究  

On Local Criminal Procedure Rules in China

作　　者：李昌盛[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院

出　　处：《南京大学法律评论》2015年第2期247-274,共28页Nanjing University Law Review

基　　金：2011年国家社科基金项目“中国地方性刑事司法规则研究”(11BFX124)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：地方性刑事诉讼规则的产生与单一制下制定法无法满足地方司法需要和中国的特殊法治发展模式密切相关。一方面,地方性规则有利于发掘地方资源优势和解决地方特殊问题,有利于为普遍性难题的化解累积经验教训,有利于避免自上而下的刑事程序变革所引发的秩序混乱,有利于搁置价值之争和刑事程序改革的启动,也有利于填补立法和司法解释的漏洞。另一方面,地方性规则也存在参与性和公开性不足、不能真正回应地方性实践需要、中立性不足和缺乏其他程序性规则的协调并进、发展空间越来越有限等缺陷。在未来,一方面需要通过集中授权和差异化授权,在顶层设计上解决地方政法机关制定规则的合法性难题,另一方面需要以正当性标准对地方性规则的内容和过程进行控制。The rise of local various criminal procedure rules, was mainly pertinent to local judicial demands which statute modal under unitary system cannot provide and particular Chinese legal system development pattern. On the one hand, local rules can help utilizing local resources efficiently and solving local practical problems, can pave the ways to solve general problems, can prevent disorder brought by up-down criminal proceeding reform, can put down the ideological argument and open the door of criminal procedure reform. On the other hand, local rules have drawbacks such as inadequate participation and openness and neutrality, neglect of local real practical demands, lack of other supported procedure rule reforms, and more and more limit of development space. In future, we need to use top-level design to solve legality problems of local judicial rules making power through centralized authorization and difference-oriented authorization, and use the legitimacy standards to control the contents and processes of local rules.

关 键 词：地方性刑事诉讼规则 单一制 授权 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]