检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋久华[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院
出 处:《南京大学法律评论》2015年第2期307-322,共16页Nanjing University Law Review
摘 要:在司法实践中,被害人拒绝与控方配合致使刑事案件因证据不足而不得不撤销、不起诉或者宣告无罪的情况时有发生,修改后的刑事诉讼法对此没有作出回应。从应然层面上讲,出于查明真实、惩罚犯罪的需要,应当充分挖掘刑事案件内部资源,赋予检察机关强制被害人配合刑事诉讼的权力,构建强制被害人为控方指证犯罪及人身检查的法律制度,从而确保刑法有效实施,维护社会秩序及国民对法律的信仰。In the judicial practice, if the victims refuse to cooperate with the prosecution, it is likely that criminal cases have to be dismissed, non-prosecuted or acquitted for insufficient evidence. In the ideal perspective, for the requirements of ascertaining the true and punishing the crime, we should fully exploit the internal resources of criminal cases, entitle the prosecution to force the victims to cooperate with the criminal procedure, and set up the system of forcing the victims to testify against crime and accept personal check for the prosecution, thereby we can ensure the effective implementation of criminal law, maintain social order and national legal belief.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.179