检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏聪[1]
机构地区:[1]国家知识产权局专利复审委员会医药生物申诉二处,北京100190
出 处:《药学进展》2015年第8期577-581,共5页Progress in Pharmaceutical Sciences
摘 要:结合具体案例分析医药生物领域专利新颖性评判的热点问题之一——新颖性推定的审查方式的主要类型和基本思路,并探讨相应的举证责任分配原则。在此基础上提出,新颖性推定方式作为一种事实推定,实际上体现了高度盖然性的评判标准,应当在推定基础、推定主体、推定过程、考量因素以及推定结论把握等方面加以规范,同时合理分配举证责任,避免主观性的干扰。In this paper, the main types and basic ideas of the review mode of novelty presumption as a hot issue on the novelty judgement of pharmaceutical and biotechnology patents were analyzed based on several concrete cases, and the corresponding principles of the allocation of burden of proof were also discussed. On this basis, it was put forward that the novelty presumption, as a fact inference, actually represents the standard of proof with high degree of probability. Therefore, the base of presumption, judgment subject, process of presumption, consideration factors and conclusion grasp should be standardized, and the burden of proof should be allocated reasonably in order to avoid the interference of subjectivity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222