“央,且也”辨误  

Differentiating “Yang,Qieye”

作　　者：何山[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学汉语言文献研究所,出土文献综合研究中心,重庆400715

出　　处：《绵阳师范学院学报》2015年第10期116-120,共5页Journal of Mianyang Teachers＇ College

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"宋辽金元石刻异体字研究及新见字字形谱"(15BYY115);重庆市社科项目"宋辽金元墓志复音词研究"(2012YBWX088);教育部人文社科基金"宋辽金元墓志纂注"(11YJC870007)的资助

摘　　要：《诗·小雅·庭燎》"夜未央"中的"央",毛传曾有解释。至唐代流传为两种训释:一为"央,旦也",见《毛诗正义》等;一为"央,且也",见《经典释文》。清代对两种说法各有拥趸。阮元曾指出"《释文》‘旦’字或误‘且’",但未予解决。本文从文献版本、词义训释和字形变异等角度加以辨析,认为前释为确诂,而后释为讹传,其"且"实为"旦"之形误。解决这一历史疑案,有助于正确理解《诗经》内容,并可纠正各种典籍未加考辨而照录《经典释文》的错误。The Yang in sentence Ye Wei Yang of Ting Liao·Xiaoxa·Book of Songs（《诗·小雅·庭燎》）, which has been interpreted in Mao Zhuan. There were two interpretations in the Tang Dynasty：one is Yang, Danxe,appeared in book of Rectification of Mao＇s Poems;the other Yang,Qiexe,in Annotation of Classics. The two viewpoints were supported by different people in the Qing Dynasty,Ruan Yuan once pointed out that the Dan was maybe mistook for Qie,but it was not proved to be true. This article differentiates and analyzes these two view-points from the angles of version,meaning explanation and orthographic variants,considering that the former is right,and the latter is wrong,the Qie is really the mistake for the Dan. To solve this historical mystery,it can not only help to understand the contents of Book of Songs,but can also correct various errors in books that are excerp-ted from Annotation of Classics.

关 键 词：央 且也 辨误 《经典释文》 《诗经》 (央 且也) 

分 类 号：G256.3[文化科学—图书馆学]