从清初灾害应对方式看“天人合一”观念的生态局限——兼论我国生态文化建设的现实根基  

The Ecological Limitations of “Union of Heaven and Man” Concept via Coping Ways of Disasters in Early Qing Dynasty——Also on the Basis of China's Ecological Culture Construction

作　　者：刘海霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东建筑大学法政学院,山东济南250101

出　　处：《泰山学院学报》2015年第5期80-84,共5页Journal of Taishan University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"环境弱势群体权益保障制度研究"(13B22006)

摘　　要："天人合一"观念在生态文化建设方面具有重要意义,但其消极影响亦不容忽视。从清初灾害应对方式来看,"天人合一"观念不利于全面分析灾害产生的原因,限制了人类抗灾救灾的主观能动性,导致在灾害应对方面缺乏针对性和消极被动。由于其理论的局限性及对实践造成的误导,"天人合一"是一个不完备的命题,必须与"天人相分"、"人定胜天"等命题合并使用,才能发挥其积极作用,避免其消极影响。Although the concept of ＂Union of tteaven and Man＂ is very important in the construction of Ecological Culture, its negative influence shouldnl be ignored. From the coping ways of disasters in early Qing Dynasty, this concept was not conductive to the comprehensive analysis of the causes of the disasters, limited the humang subjectivity and rooted in the lack of pertinence and passivity in disaster response. The theoretical limitation and misleading in practice made the concept of ＂Union of Heaven and Man＇ tion, which should be used with the propositions of ＂Detachment of Heaven and Man Heaven＂ to make it play its positive role and avoid the negative effects＂ an incomplete proposi- and ＂Man Can Conquer

关 键 词：天人合一 灾害应对方式 片面归因 消极被动 生态局限 

分 类 号：B222[哲学宗教—中国哲学]