社会契约、外邦人与犯罪治理协议  

Social Contract,Gentiles and the Agreement of Crime Government

作　　者：周建军[1] 

机构地区：[1]昆明理工大学法学院,云南昆明650500

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第5期18-24,共7页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：云南省教育厅科学研究基金重点项目"中国与东盟共同治理毒品犯罪的政策研究"(V2010)

摘　　要：卢梭的《社会契约论》否定了外邦人参与社会契约订立的情况,有悖现代制度的平等参与精神。受此启发,公民与国家订立社会契约的假说,不仅为公民权利奠定了重要的理论基础,而且树立了一个强调商谈、自治的契约范式。犯罪治理协议的形成需要加强对局外人地位和作用的研究,并以刑法契约的方式载明相关的权利、义务,构筑限制国家刑罚权力的藩篱。与此同时,刑事司法权力既不是单一的社会权力,也不是单一的中央事权,而是基于社会契约产生的、以犯罪治理为目的的事务权力。它既不属于个别社会组织,也不该为国家所垄断。It was contrary to the modern system spirits of equal participation that Rousseau＇s social contract theory denied Gentiles＇ participation in the social contract.Inspired by this,the hypotheses of making social contract between citizens and country have not only laid an important theoretical basis for civil rights,but established an contract paradigm which stressed negotiation and autonomy.The formation of the crime government protocol needs the strengthening the research of the status function of outsider,and sets forth the related rights,obligations,in the manner of the penal code and builds barriers to limit the power of national penalties.At the same time,criminal jurisdiction is neither a single social authority,nor a single central power,but the public power for the purpose of crime government.It does not belong to individual social organization,nor monopolized by country.

关 键 词：社会契约 外邦人 犯罪治理 刑事政策 

分 类 号：DF792.6[政治法律—诉讼法学]