全要素生产率如何影响我国制造业企业的区位选址决策  

How Does TFP Affect Chinese Manufacturing Firms' Regional Location Decisions?

作　　者：逯宇铎[1] 戴美虹[1] 刘海洋[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学管理与经济学部,经济学院,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《运筹与管理》2015年第5期116-125,共10页Operations Research and Management Science

基　　金：辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L12BWJ008);辽宁经济社会发展立项课题(2014lslktziyyjj-14)

摘　　要：新经济地理理论以及新近发展的…新’新经济地理理论”认为，高生产率企业通过集聚效应和选择效应存在于规模较大的市场，本文在后者理论框架下考察中国企业区位选址这一被忽视的问题。运用中国1999～2007年297个地级及以上城市100多万家企业的微观数据，采用倾向得分匹配方法克服样本选择性偏误，本文发现：相比低生产率企业组，高生产率企业选址于更大规模的城市。而且，这种选址倾向在不同区域和企业所有制上具有差异表现：相比传统中、西部地区，东部地区高生产率企业选址于大城市的倾向更为明显；相比集体企业，港澳台、外商及私营企业的这种倾向性更为显著，且估计结果显示国有企业选址不受全要素生产率水平的影响。以上发现为我国制造业企业区位选址决策的制定提供了新的思路。New Economic Geography and New New Economic Geography which is developed recently indicate that firms with higher ffp will select more larger markets through agglomeration effect and selection effect. This paper studies the problem of Chinese firms＇ regional location based on the latter theory framework. Using more than one million firms＇ records of Chinese 297 prefecture-level and above cities during 1999 -2007 and propensity score matching method to solve the problem of selectivity bias, the results indicate that：comparing to firms with lower tfp,firms with more higher tfp select more larger cities. What＇ s more,this location decision is different in differ- ent regions and firm＇ s ownership： comparing to traditional central and western regions, the trend of higher tfp firms selecting larger cities is more obvious in eastern region. Comparing to collective firms, this trend of HMT （Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan）firms,foreign and private firms is more illustrious, and results show that state- owned firms＇regional location decision is not affected by policy-making of Chinese manufacturing regional location. tfp. The results above provide a new solution for the policy-making of Chinese manufacturing regional location.

关 键 词：区位选址决策 倾向得分匹配 企业 

分 类 号：F272[经济管理—企业管理]