检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:包晓丽[1]
出 处:《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第5期81-88,共8页Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:法律—法律制度—法治,构成了法治化进程中的逻辑体系。在法治中国建设的视阈下,法律规则尤其是民事法律规则的研究成了建设法治体系的必要环节。十八届四中全会把《中华人民共和国民法典》的编纂提上了日程,对诉讼时效制度的修改以及引入取得时效制度的呼声日益高涨。这不仅是一个立法技术问题,更涉及到价值判断的范畴。故而在研习比较法经验的基础上,有必要立足于我国的社会实践和法律传统,构建对诉讼时效制度的立体认识,并反思诉讼时效与取得时效的关系与衔接问题。Law, legal system, rule of law, constitute a logic system in legalization process. Under the vision of Chinese construction of rule of law, researches on legal rules especially civil laws become an essential part in building legal system. Codification of Chinese Civil Code was put on agenda by the 4th plenary session of 18th CPC Central Committee, which leads to a growing demand for an amendment of action limitation and an introduction of acquisitive prescription system. It involves not only legislation skills but also value judgment. Therefore, besides comparative law experience, it is necessary to construct a stereoscopic theory of action limitation and consider the relationship and convergence between action limitation and acquisitive nrescrintion system according to Chinese social practice and legal traditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.161