我国“独立型”非法证据排除程序建构研究——以庭前会议为形式  

The Research of Independent Model of China's Eliminating Rules of the Illegal Evidence Process: with the Meeting before Trail as a Form

作　　者：孟婕[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学诉讼制度与司法改革研究中心,北京100872

出　　处：《法学杂志》2015年第11期131-140,共10页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：受制于我国刑事诉讼文化传统等因素,现行的非法证据排除程序未能使证据领域程序公正的价值得到贯彻。故相较于实体规则的设计补强,非法证据排除的程序完善问题于我国更为紧迫,有必要适时地对我国的刑事诉讼非法证据排除程序予以重新解构与思考。新《刑事诉讼法》规定的庭前会议制度为非法证据排除程序的建构提供了一种全新的"独立型"模式的构架思路。在研究相关域外经验与分析制度价值之后,我国以庭前会议为形式构建"独立型"非法证据排除程序的合理性与可行性都应得到承认。而在具体的制度砌筑上,启动、证明、救济制度的构建则应当是设计重点。Subject to our country＇ s Criminal procedure law cultural traditions and other factors, The current illegal evidence elimination procedure Failed to make the value of procedural justice carried through Criminal procedure evidence field, So compared with the entity rules of reinforcement design, Illegal evidence exclusion improvement program in China is more urgent, It is necessary to deconstruct illegal evidence elimination process of Criminal procedure law. The court before the meeting stipulated by the new Criminal procedure law provides a new mode of ＂independent model＂ of architecture, After research outside experience and analysis the value of this system. The rationality and feasibility of illegal evidence exclusion program of form of court before meeting in China to build ＂independent model＂ should be recognized. And on the field of specific system construction, Startup, certificate, relief system building should be designed.

关 键 词：非法证据排除程序 独立价值 程序公正 程序性裁决 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]