检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:乔超锋[1] 乔祖俊[1] 王刚[1] 杜信冈[1] 冯振华[1] 靳磊[1]
机构地区:[1]河南理工大学第一附属医院普外二科焦作市第二人民医院普外二科,焦作454000
出 处:《中国实用医刊》2015年第22期18-19,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨腹腔镜与开腹行进展期胃癌D2根治术的临床效果。方法选取2013年9月至2014年9月收治的120例胃癌患者作为研究对象,按照随机分组法将其分为对照组和观察组,每组60例,比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗进展期胃癌患者的临床疗效。结果与对照组比较,观察组手术时间相对较长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组住院时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);两组淋巴结清除数目比较差异未见统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论与开腹手术比较,腹腔镜直视下行进展期胃癌D2手术虽具有同样的手术治疗效果,但腹腔镜手术具有住院时间短、出血量少、胃肠道功能恢复快以及术后疼痛少等优点。Objective To investigate the clinical effects of laparoscopic and laparotomy D2 radi-cal resection on advanced gastric cancer.Methods One hundred and twenty cases of gastric cancer in our hospital from September 2013 to September 2014 were treated during the study according to the ran-domization method, and they were divided into the control group and the observation group with 60 cases in each group.The clinical efficacy of patients with advanced gastric cancer in the two groups were com-pared.Results Compared with the control group, the operation time was longer in the observation group, the difference was significant (P〈0.05);the hospitalization time, blood loss, postoperative gastrointesti-nal function recovery time in the observation group was significantly superior to those in the control group, the differences were significant ( P〈0.05 ); there was no significant difference in the lymphadenectomy number between the two groups ( P〉0.05) .Conclusions Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic D2 radical resection for advanced gastric cancer has the same effect, but laparoscopic surgery has shorter hos-pital stay, less blood loss, faster recovery of gastrointestinal function and less postoperative pain.
关 键 词:开腹手术 腹腔镜 进展期胃癌D2根治术 临床效果
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15