检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王宗辉[1]
出 处:《吕梁学院学报》2015年第4期38-41,共4页Journal of Lyuiang University
摘 要:在朝代更迭的历史洪流中,催生出一套君臣之间特有的饱含政治权力斗争内蕴的话语机制,即隐藏在话语背后的君臣之间关于政治上的角逐与博弈。角逐与博弈的结果却是政权秩序紊乱之后的重新制衡。在专制主义中央集权累积为巅峰之势的清王朝,这种君臣之间争夺话语权的交锋演变得更为惊心动魄。若援君(咸丰)与臣(祁寯藻、曾国藩)之间的话语博弈为例,则当以其彼此之间不同性质、种类的对话及相应代言人如门徒、同乡等的撰述为切入点,着重梳理此番君臣之间话语博弈之后所恢复的制衡关系。Historically,the unique mechanism of discourse between Monarch and ministers was born and hidden in power fights,the result of which is the re- balance of political power after political chaos. Qing Dynasty reached the pinnacle of autocratic centralization when the fights of discourse rights were evolved to be more thrilling. With the examples of Emperor Xianfeng and his ministers Zeng Guofan and Qi Junzao,the paper analyzed the balances of political power between the Monarch and the ministers through discourse game.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.208.99