检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈晓平[1]
出 处:《晋阳学刊》2015年第6期78-85,共8页Academic Journal of Jinyang
基 金:国家社科基金项目"功能主义与身心问题研究"(项目编号:10BZX020);广东省社会科学"十一五"规划项目"非还原物理主义如何可能"(项目编号:09C-01);中国逻辑学会学术研究重点项目"对塔斯基页理论的批评与重建"(项目编号:13CLZD001)阶段成果
摘 要:对日常生活中的善与恶的分辨最终需要追溯到道德哲学的基本分野,即功利论与道义论。功利论评价善与恶的基本标准是"最大幸福原则",因而是相对的和有条件的;道义论评价善与恶的标准是基于善良意志的,因而是绝对的和无条件的。就日常生活的道德规范而言,功利主义具有更强的适用性和可行性。在此,由功利主义基本原则派生出"自愿原则"和"随机原则"等,用以解决桑德尔在其"正义"公开课上讨论的若干案例,并得出不同的结论。The distinction between good and evil in our daily life need to trace back finally to the basic divided schools of moral philosophy, utilitarianism and deontology. The utilitarian criterion of appraising good or evil is the greatest happiness principle, and it is relative and conditional. The deontological criterion of appraising good or evil is based on the good will, and it is absolute and unconditional. As far as norms of daily life are concerned, utilitarianism has more applicability and feasibility. I derive the principle of voluntariness and the principle of random from the utilitarian principle, thereby dealing with the cases presented by Sandel in his open class of justice and giving somedifferent answers to them.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233