社会法“法域”定位的偏失与理性回归  

Deviation of Fixed Position of Social Law and Its Rational Regression

作　　者：余少祥[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所

出　　处：《政法论坛》2015年第6期30-42,共13页Tribune of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：将社会法视为与公法和私法并列的"第三法域"是当前流行的思想理论学说之一,是误读哈贝马斯"公共领域"理论的结果。社会法不应定位为"法域",社会法与社会问题、社会权和社会安全也不是一一对应关系。社会利益本位论是不成立的,社会利益也不是社会法专有的利益。第三法域是存在的,但社会法不等于第三法域。社会法是第三法域的法部门之一,它是基于保护弱者的理念产生的,之后渐次发展到为社会成员提供普遍保险和普遍福利等,其法益本位也从弱者的利益逐渐提升为社会整体利益。Regarding social law, parallelled to public law and private law, as ＂third scope of law＂, is one of the current popular theories, which is the result of misunderstanding Habermas＇ s public sphere theory. So- cial law should not be positioned as ＂Scope of Law＂, and it is not corresponding to social problems, social right and social security. Social interest standard theory doesn＇t make sense, and social interests are not proprietary interests of social law. Third scope of law exists, but social law is not equal to third scope of law. Social law is one of the Department of third scopes of Law, which is produced based on the concept of protecting the weak, then gradually developed to provide universal insurance and universal welfare to members of society, and its standard of law interests is gradually promoted to the whole society.

关 键 词：社会法 第三法域 法部门 

分 类 号：D910[政治法律—法学]